|
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Section
I Use of English
Directions:
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each
numbered blank and mark A,B,£Ãor D on ANSWER SHEET£±.(10points)
¡¡¡¡The homeless make up a growing percentage of America¡¯s population.__1__
homelessness has reached such proportions that local government
can¡¯t possibly _____2____. To help homeless people _____3___
independence, the federal government must support job training
programs,_____4_____ the minimum wage, and fund more low-cost
housing._____5____everyone agrees on the numbers of Americans
who are homeless. Estimates ____6__ anywhere from 600,000
to 3 million. _____7__ the figure may vary, analysts do agree
on another matter: that the number of the homeless is_____8____,
one of the federal government¡¯s studies _____9__ that the
number of the homeless will reach nearly 19 million by the
end of this decade.
Finding ways to __10__ this growing homeless population has
become increasingly difficult.___11__when homeless individuals
manage to find a ___12__ that will give them three meals a
day and a place to sleep at night, a good number still spend
the bulk of each day__13__ the street, Part of the problem
is that many homeless adults are addicted to alcohol or drugs.
And a significant number of the homeless have serious mental
disorders. Many others,____14____not addicted or mentally
ill, simply lack the everyday __15__ skills needed to turn
their lives _____16__.Boston Globe reporter Chris Reidy notes
that the situation will improve only when there are_17___programs
that address the many needs of the homeless. _____18__ Edward
Blotkowsk, director of community service at Bentley College
in Massachusetts,___19__it. ¡°There has to be _____20___of
programs. What we need is a package deal.¡±
¡¡¡¡1£® [A]Indeed ¡¡ ¡¡[B]Likewise ¡¡¡¡[C]Therefore ¡¡¡¡[D]Furthermore
¡¡¡¡2£® [A]stand ¡¡ ¡¡ [B]cope ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[C]approve ¡¡¡¡¡¡[D]retain
¡¡¡¡3£® [A]in ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡[B]for ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ [C]with ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡[D]toward
¡¡¡¡4£® [A]raise ¡¡ ¡¡ [B]add ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ [C]take ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ [D]keep
¡¡¡¡5£® [A]generally ¡¡[B]almost ¡¡ ¡¡ [C]hardly ¡¡¡¡¡¡ [D]not
¡¡¡¡6£® [A]cover ¡¡¡¡¡¡[B]change ¡¡ ¡¡ [C]range ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[D]differ
¡¡¡¡7£® [A]Now that ¡¡ [B]Although ¡¡¡¡[C]Provided ¡¡¡¡[D]Except that
¡¡¡¡8£® [A]inflating ¡¡[B]expanding ¡¡ [C]increasing ¡¡[D]extending
¡¡¡¡9£® [A]predicts ¡¡ [B]displays ¡¡¡¡[C]proves ¡¡¡¡¡¡[D]discovers
¡¡¡¡10¡¡[A]assist ¡¡¡¡ [B]track ¡¡¡¡¡¡ [C]sustain ¡¡¡¡ [D]dismiss
¡¡¡¡11£®[A]Hence ¡¡¡¡¡¡[B]But ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ [C]Even ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[D]Only
¡¡¡¡12£®[A]lodging ¡¡¡¡[B]shelter ¡¡¡¡ [C]dwelling ¡¡¡¡[D]house
¡¡¡¡13£®[A]searching ¡¡[B]strolling ¡¡ [C]crowding ¡¡¡¡[D]wandering
¡¡¡¡14£®[A]when ¡¡¡¡¡¡ [B]once ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[C]while ¡¡¡¡¡¡ [D]whereas
¡¡¡¡15£®[A]life¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[B]existence ¡¡ [C]survival ¡¡¡¡[D]maintenance
¡¡¡¡16£®[A]around ¡¡¡¡ [B]over ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[C]on ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[D]up
¡¡¡¡17£®[A]complex ¡¡¡¡[B]comprehensive[C]complementary[D]compensating
¡¡¡¡18£®[A]So ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ [B]Since ¡¡¡¡ ¡¡[C]As ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡[D]Thus
¡¡¡¡19£®[A]puts ¡¡¡¡¡¡ [B]interprets ¡¡[C]assumes ¡¡¡¡ [D]makes
¡¡¡¡20£®[A]supervision [B]manipulation [C]regulation ¡¡[D]coordination
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Section II Reading Comprehension
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part A
Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below
each text by choosing A, B,C, or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER
SHEET 1.(40 points)
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Text 1
¡¡¡¡In spite of ¡°endless talk of difference,¡± American society
is an amazing machine for homogenizing people. This is ¡°the
democratizing uniformity of dress and discourse, and the casualness
and absence of consumption ¡°launched by the 19th ?century
department stores that offered ¡®vast arrays of goods in an
elegant atmosphere. Instead of intimate shops catering to
a knowledgeable elite.¡± these were stores ¡°anyone could enter,
regardless of class or background. This turned shopping into
a public and democratic act.¡± The mass media, advertising
and sports are other forces for homogenization.
¡¡¡¡Immigrants are quickly fitting into this common culture,
which may not be altogether elevating but is hardly poisonous.
Writing for the National Immigration Forum, Gregory Rodriguez
reports that today¡¯s immigration is neither at unprecedented
level nor resistant to assimilation. In 1998 immigrants were
9.8 percent of population; in 1900, 13.6 percent. In the 10
years prior to 1990, 3.1 immigrants arrived for every 1,000
residents; in the 10 years prior to 1890, 9.2 for every 1,000.
Now, consider three indices of assimilation------language,
home ownership and intermarriage.
The 1990 Census revealed that ¡°a majority of immigrants from
each of the fifteen most common countries of origin spoke
English ¡°well¡± or ¡°very well¡± after ten years of residence.¡±
The children of immigrants tend to be bilingual and proficient
in English. ¡°By the third generation, the original language
is lost in the majority of immigrant families.¡± Hence the
description of America as a graveyard¡± for language. By 1996
foreign-born immigrants who had arrive before 1970 had a home
ownership rate of 75.6 percent, higher than the 69.8 percent
rate among native-born Americans.
Foreign-born Asians and Hispanics ¡°have higher rates of intermarriage
than do U.S-born whites and blacks.¡± By the third generation,
one third of Hispanic women are married to non-Hispanics,
and 41 percent of Asian-American women are married to non-Asians.
¡¡¡¡Rodriguez not that children in remote villages around world
are fans of superstars like Amold Schwarzenegger and Garth
Brooks, yet ¡°some Americans fear that immigrant living within
the United States remain somehow immune to the nation¡¯s assimilative
power.¡±
Are there divisive issues and pockets of seething in America?
Indeed. It is big enough to have a bit of everything. But
particularly when viewed against America¡¯s turbulent past,
today¡¯s social indices suggest a dark and deteriorating social
environment.
¡¡¡¡21£® The word ¡°homogenizing¡± (Line 2, Paragraph
1) most probably means
¡¡¡¡A. identifying¡¡¡¡ B. associating¡¡¡¡ C. assimilating ¡¡¡¡D. monopolizing
¡¡¡¡22. According to the author, the department
stores of the 19th century
¡¡¡¡A. played a role in the spread of popular culture.
¡¡¡¡B. became intimate shops for common consumers.
¡¡¡¡C. satisfied the needs of a knowledgeable elite.
¡¡¡¡D. owed its emergence to the culture of consumption.
¡¡¡¡23. The text suggests that immigrants now in
the U.S.
¡¡¡¡A. are resistant to homogenization.
¡¡¡¡B. exert a great influence on American culture.
¡¡¡¡C. are hardly a threat to the common culture.
¡¡¡¡D. constitute the majority of the population.
¡¡¡¡24. Why are Amold Schwarzenegger and Garth Brooks
mentioned in Paragraph 5?
¡¡¡¡A. To prove their popularity around the world.
¡¡¡¡B. To reveal the public¡¯s fear of immigrants.
¡¡¡¡C. To give examples of successful immigrants.
¡¡¡¡D. To show the powerful influence of American culture.
¡¡¡¡25. In the author¡¯s opinion, the absorption
of immigrants into American society is
¡¡¡¡A. rewarding ¡¡¡¡B. successful ¡¡¡¡C. fruitless ¡¡¡¡D. harmful
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Text 2
¡¡¡¡Stratford-on-Avon, as we all know, has only one industry?William
Shakespeare?but there are two distinctly separate and increasingly
hostile branches. There is the Royal Shakespeare Company (ASC),
which presents superb productions of the plays at the Shakespeare
Memorial Theatre on the Avon. And there are the townsfolk
who largely live off the tourists who come, not to see the
plays, but to look at Anne Hathaway¡¯s Cottage, Shakespeare¡¯s
birthplace and the other sights.
The worthy residents of Stratford doubt that the theatre adds
a penny to their revenue. They frankly dislike the RSC¡¯s actors,
them with their long hair and beards and sandals and noisiness.
It¡¯s all deliciously ironic when you consider that Shakespeare,
who earns their living, was himself an actor (with a beard)
and did his share of noise-making.
¡¡¡¡The tourist streams are not entirely separate. The sightseers
who come by bus- and often take in Warwick Castle and Blenheim
Palace on the side?don¡¯t usually see the plays, and some of
them are even surprised to find a theatre in Stratford. However,
the playgoers do manage a little sight-seeing along with their
playgoing. It is the playgoers, the ESC contends, who bring
in much of the town¡¯s revenue because they spend the night
(some of them four or five nights) pouring cash into the hotels
and restaurants. The sightseers can take in everything and
get out of town by nightfall.
The townsfolk don¡¯t see it this way and local council does
not contribute directly to the subsidy of the Royal Shakespeare
Company. Stratford cries poor traditionally. Nevertheless
every hotel in town seems to be adding a new wing or cocktail
lounge. Hilton is building its own hotel there, which you
may be sure will be decorated with Hamlet Hamburger Bars,
the Lear Lounge, the Banquo Banqueting Room, and so forth,
and will be very expensive.
¡¡¡¡Anyway, the townsfolk can¡¯t understand why the Royal Shakespeare
Company needs a subsidy. (The theatre has broken attendance
records for three years in a row. Last year its 1,431 seats
were 94 percent occupied all year long and this year they¡¯ll
do better.) The reason, of course, is that costs have rocketed
and ticket prices have stayed low.
¡¡¡¡It would be a shame to raise prices too much because it
would drive away the young people who are Stratford¡¯s most
attractive clientele. They come entirely for the plays, not
the sights. They all seem to look alike (though they come
from all over)---lean, pointed, dedicated faces, wearing jeans
and sandals, eating their buns and bedding down for the night
on the flagstones outside the theatre to buy the 20 seats
and 80 standing?room tickets held for the sleepers and sold
to them when the box office opens at 10:30 a.m.
¡¡¡¡26. From the first two paras , we learn that
¡¡¡¡A. the townsfolk deny the RSC ¡¯ s contribution to the town¡¯s
revenue
¡¡¡¡B. the actors of the RSC imitate Shakespeare on and off
stage
¡¡¡¡C. the two branches of the RSC are not on good terms
¡¡¡¡D. the townsfolk earn little from tourism
¡¡¡¡27. It can be inferred from Para 3 that
¡¡¡¡A. the sightseers cannot visit the Castle and the Palace
separately
¡¡¡¡B. the playgoers spend more money than the sightseers
¡¡¡¡C. the sightseers do more shopping than the playgoers
¡¡¡¡D. the playgoers go to no other places in town than the
theater
¡¡¡¡28. By saying ¡°Stratford cries poor traditionally¡± (Line
2-3, Paragraph 4), the author implies that
¡¡¡¡A. Stratford cannot afford the expansion projects
¡¡¡¡B. Stratford has long been in financial difficulties
¡¡¡¡C. the town is not really short of money
¡¡¡¡D. the townsfolk used to be poorly paid
¡¡¡¡ 29. According to the townsfolk, the RSC deserves no subsidy
because
¡¡¡¡A. ticket prices can be raised to cover the spending
¡¡¡¡B. the company is financially ill-managed
¡¡¡¡C. the behavior of the actors is not socially acceptable
¡¡¡¡D. the theatre attendance is on the rise
¡¡¡¡30. From the text we can conclude that the author
¡¡¡¡A. is supportive of both sides
¡¡¡¡B. favors the townsfolk¡¯s view
¡¡¡¡C. takes a detached attitude
¡¡¡¡D. is sympathetic
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Text 3
¡¡¡¡When prehistoric man arrived in new parts of the world,
something strange happened to the large animals. They suddenly
became extinct. Smaller species survived. The large, slow-growing
animals were easy game, and were quickly hunted to extinction.
Now something similar could be happening in the oceans.
¡¡¡¡That the seas are being overfished has been known for years.
What researchers such as Ransom Myers and Boris Worm have
shown is just how fast things are changing. They have looked
at half a century of data from fisheries around the world.
Their methods do not attempt to estimate the actual biomass
(the amount of living biological matter) of fish species in
particular parts of the ocean, but rather changes in that
biomass over time. According to their latest paper published
in Nature, the biomass of large predators (animals that kill
and eat other animals) in a new fishery is reduced on average
by 80% within 15 years of the start of exploitation. In some
long-fished areas, it has halved again since then.
¡¡¡¡Dr Worm acknowledges that the figures are conservative.
One reason for this is that fishing technology has improved.
Today's vessels can find their prey using satellites and sonar,
which were not available 50 years ago. That means a higher
proportion of what is in the sea is being caught, so the real
difference between present and past is likely to be worse
than the one recorded by changes in catch sizes. In the early
days, too, longlines would have been more saturated with fish.
Some individuals would therefore not have been caught, since
no baited hooks would have been available to trap them, leading
to an underestimate of fish stocks in the past. Furthermore,
in the early days of longline fishing, a lot of fish were
lost to sharks after they had been hooked. That is no longer
a problem, because there are fewer sharks around now.
¡¡¡¡Dr Myers and Dr Worm argue that their work gives a correct
baseline, which future management efforts must take into account.
They believe the data support an idea current among marine
biologists, that of the "shifting baseline". The
notion is that people have failed to detect the massive changes
which have happened in the ocean because they have been looking
back only a relatively short time into the past. That matters
because theory suggests that the maximum sustainable yield
that can be cropped from a fishery comes when the biomass
of a target species is about 50% of its original levels. Most
fisheries are well below that, which is a bad way to do business.
¡¡¡¡31. The extinction of large prehistoric animals
is noted to suggest that
¡¡¡¡A. large animals were vulnerable to the changing environment.
¡¡¡¡B. small species survived as large animals disappeared.
¡¡¡¡C. large sea animals may face the same threat today.
¡¡¡¡D. Slow-growing fish outlive fast-growing ones
¡¡¡¡32. We can infer from Dr Myers and Dr. Worm¡¯s
paper that
¡¡¡¡A. the stock of large predators in some old fisheries has
reduced by 90%.
¡¡¡¡B. there are only half as many fisheries as there were 15
years ago.
¡¡¡¡C. the catch sizes in new fisheries are only 20% of the
original amount.
¡¡¡¡D. the number of larger predators dropped faster in new
fisheries than in the old.
¡¡¡¡33£® By saying these figures are conservative
(Line 1, paragraph 3), Dr Worm means that
¡¡¡¡A. fishing technology has improved rapidly
¡¡¡¡B. then catch-sizes are actually smaller then recorded
¡¡¡¡C. the marine biomass has suffered a greater loss
¡¡¡¡D. the data collected so far are out of date.
¡¡¡¡34. Dr Myers and other researchers hold that
¡¡¡¡A. people should look for a baseline that can¡¯t work for
a longer time.
¡¡¡¡B. fisheries should keep the yield below 50% of the biomass
¡¡¡¡C. the ocean biomass should restored its original level.
¡¡¡¡D. people should adjust the fishing baseline to changing
situations
¡¡¡¡35. The author seems to be mainly concerned
with most fisheries¡¯
¡¡¡¡A. management efficiency
¡¡¡¡B. biomass level
¡¡¡¡C. catch-size limits
¡¡¡¡D. technological application.
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Text 4
¡¡¡¡Many things make people think artists are weird and the
weirdest may be this: artists' only job is to explore emotions,
and yet they choose to focus on the ones that feel bad.
This wasn't always so. The earliest forms of art, like painting
and music, are those best suited for expressing joy. But somewhere
in the 19th century, more artists began seeing happiness as
insipid, phony or, worst of all, boring as we went from Wordsworth's
daffodils to Baudelaire's flowers of evil.
¡¡¡¡You could argue that art became more skeptical of happiness
because modern times have seen such misery. But it's not as
if earlier times didn't know perpetual war, disaster and the
massacre of innocents. The reason, in fact, may be just the
opposite: there is too much damn happiness in the world today.
¡¡¡¡After all, what is the one modern form of expression almost
completely dedicated to depicting happiness? Advertising.
The rise of anti-happy art almost exactly tracks the emergence
of mass media, and with it, a commercial culture in which
happiness is not just an ideal but an ideology.
¡¡¡¡People in earlier eras were surrounded by reminders of misery.
They worked until exhausted, lived with few protections and
died young. In the West, before mass communication and literacy,
the most powerful mass medium was the church, which reminded
worshippers that their souls were in peril and that they would
someday be meat for worms. Given all this, they did not exactly
need their art to be a bummer too.
¡¡¡¡Today the messages your average Westerner is bombarded with
are not religious but commercial, and forever happy. Fast-food
eaters, news anchors, text messengers, all smiling, smiling.
Our magazines feature beaming celebrities and happy families
in perfect homes. And since these messages have an agenda--to
lure us to open our wallets to make the very idea of happiness
seem unreliable. "Celebrate!" commanded the ads
for the arthritis drug Celebrex, before we found out it could
increase the risk of heart attacks.
¡¡¡¡What we forget--what our economy depends on is forgetting--is
that happiness is more than pleasure without pain. The things
that bring the greatest joy carry the greatest potential for
loss and disappointment. Today, surrounded by promises of
easy happiness, we need someone to tell us as religion once
did, Memento mori: remember that you will die, that everything
ends, and that happiness comes not in denying this but in
living with it. It's a message even more bitter than a clove
cigarette, yet, somehow, a breath of fresh air.
¡¡¡¡36£®By citing the example of poets Wordsworth
and Baudelaire, the author intends to show that
¡¡¡¡A. Poetry is not as expressive of joy as painting or music.
¡¡¡¡B. Art grows out of both positive and negative feeling.
¡¡¡¡C. Poets today are less skeptical of happiness.
¡¡¡¡D. Artist have changed their focus of interest.
¡¡¡¡37. The word ¡°bummer¡± (Line 5. paragraph 5)
most probably means something
¡¡¡¡A. religious¡¡¡¡ B. unpleasant ¡¡¡¡C. entertaining ¡¡¡¡D. commercial
¡¡¡¡38. In the author¡¯s opinion, advertising
¡¡¡¡A. emerges in the wake of the anti-happy part.
¡¡¡¡B. is a cause of disappointment for the general peer
¡¡¡¡C. replaces the church as a major source of information
¡¡¡¡D. creates an illusion of happiness rather than happiness
itself.
¡¡¡¡39. We can learn from the last paragraph that
the author believes
¡¡¡¡A. Happiness more often than not ends in sadness.
¡¡¡¡B. The anti-happy art is distasteful by refreshing.
¡¡¡¡C. Misery should be enjoyed rather than denied.
¡¡¡¡D. The anti-happy art flourishes when economy booms
¡¡¡¡40. Which of the following is true of the text?
¡¡¡¡A. Religion once functioned as a reminder of misery.
¡¡¡¡B. Art provides a balance between expectation and reality.
¡¡¡¡C. People feel disappointed at the realities of morality.
¡¡¡¡D. mass media are inclined to cover disasters and deaths.
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part B
Directions: In the following text, some sentences
have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable
one from the list A- G to fit into each of numbered blanks.
There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the
blanks. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
¡¡¡¡On the north bank of the Ohio River sits Evansville, Ind.,
home of David Williams, 52, and of a riverboat casino where
gambling games are played. During several years of gambling
in that casino, Williams, a state auditor earning $35,000
a year, lost approximately $175,000. He had never gambled
before the casino sent him a coupon for $20 worth of gambling.
¡¡¡¡He visited the casino, lost the $20 and left. On his second
visit he lost $800. The casino issued to him, as a good customer,
a Fun Card, which when used in the casino earns points for
meals and drinks, and enables the casino to track the user's
gambling activities. For Williams, these activities become
what he calls electronic morphine. ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡(41)______________.
In 1997 he lost $21,000 to one slot machine in two days. In
March 1997 he lost $72,186. He ¡¡¡¡sometimes played two slot
machines at a time, all night, until the boat locked at 5
a.m., then went back aboard when the casino opened at 9 a.m.
Now he is suing the casino, charging that it should have refused
his patronage because it knew he was addicted. It did know
he had a problem.
¡¡¡¡In March 1998, a friend of Williams's got him involuntarily
confined to a treatment center for addictions, and wrote to
inform the casino of Williams's gamblers. The casino included
a photo of Williams among those of banned gamblers, and wrote
to him a¡± cease admissions¡± letter noting the medical/psychological
nature of problem gambling behaviors, the letter said that
before being readmitted to the patronizing the casino would
pose no threat to his safety have to his safety or well-being.
¡¡¡¡(42) ______________.
¡¡¡¡The Wall Street Journal reports that the casino has 20 signs
warning: ¡°Enjoy the fun ... and always bet with your head,
not over it¡±. Every entrance ticket lists a toll-free number
for counseling from the Indiana Department of Mental Health.
Nevertheless, Williams's suit charges that the casino, knowing
he was ¡°helplessly addicted to gambling¡±, intentionally worked
to ¡±love¡± him to ¡°engage in conduct against his will¡± well.
¡¡¡¡(43) ______________.
¡¡¡¡The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) says ¡°pathological gambling¡±
involves persistent, recurring and uncontrollable pursuit
less of money than of taking risks in quest of a windfall,
¡¡¡¡¡¡(44) ______________.Pushed by science, or what claims to
be science, society is reclassifying what once were considered
character flaws or moral failings as personality disorders
akin to physical disabilities.
¡¡¡¡ (45) ______________.
¡¡¡¡Forty-four states have lotteries, 29 have casinos, and most
of these states are to varying degrees dependent on --you
might say --addicted to--revenues from wagering. And since
the first Internet gambling site was created in 1995, competition
for gamblers' dollars has become intense. The Oct. 28 issue
of NEWSWEEK reported that 2 million gamblers patronize 1,800
virtual casinos every week. With $3.5 billion being lost on
Internet wagers this year, gambling has passed pornography
as the Web's most profitable business.
¡¡¡¡(A). Although no such evidence was presented,
the casino's marketing department continued to pepper him
with mailings. And he entered the casino and used his Fun
Card without being detected.
¡¡¡¡(B). It is unclear what luring was required, given his compulsive
behavior. And in what sense was his will operative?
¡¡¡¡(C). By the time he had lost $5,000 he said to himself that
if he could get back to even, he would quit. One night he
won $5,500, but he did not quit.
¡¡¡¡(D). Gambling has been a common feature of American life
forever, but for a long time it was broadly considered a sin,
or a social disease. Now it is a social policy: the most important
and aggressive promoter of gambling in America is government.
¡¡¡¡(E). David Williams¡¯s suit should trouble this gambling
nation. But don¡¯t bet on it.
¡¡¡¡(F). It is worrisome that society is medicalizing more and
more behavioral problems, often defining as addictions what
earlier, sterner generations explained as weakness of will.
¡¡¡¡(G). The anonymous, lonely, undistracted nature of online
gambling is especially conductive to compulsive behavior.
But even if the government knew how to move against Internet
gambling, what would be its grounds for doing so?
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Part C
Directions:
Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined
segments into Chinese. Our translation should be written neatly
on ANSWER SHEET2. (10 points)
¡¡¡¡Is it true that the American intellectual is rejected and
considered of no account in his society? I am going to suggest
that it is not true. Father Bruckbergen told part of the story
when he observed that it is the intellectuals who have rejected
Americans. But they have done more than that. They have grown
dissatisfied with the role of intellectual. It is they, not
Americans, who have become anti-intellectual.
¡¡¡¡First, the object of our study pleads for definition. What
is an intellectual? (46) I shall define him as an individual
who has elected as his primary duty and pleasure in life the
activity of thinking in Socratic(ËÕ¸ñÀµ×) way about moral problems
.He explores such problem consciously, articulately, and frankly,
first by asking factual questions, then by asking moral questions,
finally by suggesting action which seems appropriate in the
light of the factual and moral information which he has obtained.
(47) His function is analogous to that of a judge, who must
accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a matter
as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.
¡¡¡¡ This definition excludes many individuals usually referred
to as intellectuals --- the average scientist for one 48)
I have excluded him because, while his accomplishments may
contribute to the solution of moral problems, he has not been
charged with the task of approaching any but the factual aspects
of those problems. Like other human beings, he encounters
moral issues even in everyday performance of his routine duties.---
he is not supposed to cook his experiments, manufacture evidence,
or doctor his reports. (49) But his primary task is not to
think about the moral code, which governs his activity, any
more than a businessman is expected to dedicate his energies
to an exploration of rules of conduct in business. During
most of his walking life he will take his code for granted,
as the businessman takes his ethics.
¡¡¡¡The definition also excludes the majority of factors, despite
the fact that teaching has traditionally been the method whereby
many intellectuals earn their living (50) They may teach very
well and more than earn their salaries, but most of them make
little or no independent reflections on human problems which
involve moral judgment .This description even fits the majority
eminent scholars .¡°Being learned in some branch of human knowledge
in one thing, living in public and industrious thoughts,¡±
as Emerson would say ,is something else.
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Section III Writing
¡¡¡¡Part A
¡¡¡¡51. Directions:You want to contribute to
Project Hope by offering financial aid to a child in a remote
area. Write a letter to the department concerned, asking them
to help find a candidate. You should specify what kind of
child you want to help and how you will carry out your plan.
¡¡¡¡Write your letter with no less than 100 words. Write it
on ANSWER SHEET 2. Do not sign your name at the end of the
letter; use Li Ming instead. You do not need to write the
address. (10 points)
¡¡¡¡Part B
¡¡¡¡52. Directions: Study the following photos
carefully and write an essay in which you should
¡¡¡¡1. describe the photos briefly,
¡¡¡¡2. interpret the social phenomenon reflected by them, and
¡¡¡¡3. give your point of view.
¡¡¡¡You should write 160-200 words neatly on ANSWER SHEET2.(20
points)
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
|